Wednesday, November 16, 2005

The Blog of War


Foriegn correspondents of the future beware!
A brief glance at the reporters without borders web-site will give you a good indication of how little freedom of expression is valued in many of the world's countries.

The website runs a tally of how many journalists and media assistants have been killed since the start of fighting in Iraq in March 2003. An alarming 74 dead so far, and two still missing.

Little wonder then that the Guardian announced today that it will no longer maintain a fulltime correspondent in Baghdad. After the abduction of Rory Carroll last month, the paper held an internal review and decided it would be less risky for the journalists involved if they took turns out there.

"From the beginning of next year we will have a rota system. We will be there most of the time but we will have four or five people for four- or five-week stints"

An understandable position, but a little saddening. Even before the switch to part-time correspondents, it seems foreign journalists in Iraq rarely moved far beyond the walls of their compounds.

I made my way out to the Stilorgan hotel last month to attend a talk given by Robert Fisk. He touched on a huge range of issues, including the abduction of Rory Carroll and the dangers of reporting from Iraq. He described how foreign journalists rarely if ever ventured beyond the walls of their guarded compounds, instead forced into sub-contracting the risk out to local journalists.

A wee aside: Apparently the hired men standing guard on the towers of the New York Time's compound wear New York times t-shirts over their bullet proof vests, which I thought quite amusing, if its true (is it some sort of marketing thing, or just the crappiest of uniforms?).

Anyhow, I'm rambling on so I'll get back to the point.Fisk, a man of tremendous courage, said that while he may go back for one last visit, it was just too dangerous for him to think about working out there again. Once again, completely understandable, particularly coming from a man who has put his life on the line many times over during the course of his career.

But it does raise a question. If its too dangerous for the hardiest of professional journalists like Fisk and Carroll, where oh where will the news from Iraq be coming from?

And should the western media have kept so damn quiet when Al-Jazeera were getting turfed out of the country?

What do you reckon?

Don't make me use my mind-reading device 'cos if I do, it ain't gonna be pretty!

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

hi john...
mike put me on to your blog, for which i am grateful...
it's interesting stuff, and i got a sense of connection from it, much like the sense that you talk about with the laundry men, but also like the connection with the [geography] of your community (finding the right baker, making it YOUR baker, etc.)...I am not talking about a connection to you in particular (though that is unavoidable, as it is your doings that are the primary focus), but rather with dublin and the people that you interact with and ireland as a whole...i feel as though i'm seeing these things through someone else's eyes...i dunno...

anyway...it's interesting stuff...

mostly i decided to write you a little note, just so you knew SOMEONE was reading, and you weren't just talking to yourself:)

Anonymous said...

Hi John,
Mick also put onto your blog but unlike diarmuid I have something to contribute.

It's definitely disheartening to see the correspondants and embedded reporters leave. One site which I was reading for a while was this one. The reporter in this case was independant of any news company and he just posted on his website, but he's since stopped travelling to iraq because his interpreter said he can't come back unless he gets a steel neck (this guy didn't stay in the green zone).

I guess if no one is going to go to these countries anymore then we just have to go with the people that live in the country.

John Higgins said...

Thanks for your comments Paddy. interesting links.